Fenceline Radiation at VY – how much radiation are you getting?
Statehouse, Montpelier Vermont
Synopsis of Oct. 8, 2008 hearing (re: Radiation
Monitoring at Vermont Yankee), recessed until a date to be announced.
The Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules grilled Vermont Department of
Health (VDH) Radiation Dept. Chief Bill Irwin for 3 hours about his vacillation
on whether to follow or not follow the Administrative Procedures Act and hold
public hearings on the rule change. Irwin kept insisting that there was no rule
change, and that no one ever asked him or the Dept. to hold hearings. (That
last bit is incorrect, since he was explicitly asked to conduct an open process
if he thought the radiation regs needed updating,
after his presentation in Brattleboro). However, Rep. Marek can do math, and noticed that as
gamma releases from Yankee went up, reported measurements of direct gamma at
the fenceline were going down, and given the
famous 25% uncertainty margin, VDH has been allowing Entergy to release up to
31 mrem for years, even under the original regulation.
If the rule has not been changed, the ruler has (perhaps VDH is using a
"slide" rule.) Committee members wondered why Irwin and others at VDH
said several times in the press and in internal memos that there would be a rule change and a
public process, then failed to follow through.
Irwin had trouble explaining why he changed his mind about that--he said after
the hearing that VDH
attorneys had advised him improperly. Rep. Marek and the committee
were unrelenting in their questions. They will be reconvening at a later date
to hear testimony from citizens who had traveled to Montpelier to testify. It will be interesting
to see how or whether the Rules Committee chooses to remedy the violation of
the Admin. Procedures Act...They could demand a full rulemaking process, at
which point any individual could ask for an injunction to enforce the existing
rule (1 rad = 1 rem),
potentially making Yankee power down.
Members
of the public interested in providing testimony should contact Katie Pickens, assistant
to the Joint Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules, 802-828-5760.
---------
following is the Press Release for the 10/8/08 meeting --------
PRESS
RELEASE
General
Assembly – 133 State Street
– Montpelier, VT 05602 – 802-828-2228 – Fax: 802-828-2424
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Date: October 2, 2008
Contact: Katie Pickens Phone:
828-5760 Fax:
828-2424
Public Hearing on the Department of Health Rules on
Radiation Monitoring at Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant, Including the
Department’s Revision of the Computation Standards for Annual Acceptable Doses
of Gamma Radiation.
Montpelier,
VT. The Joint Legislative Committee on
Administrative Rules has scheduled a public hearing on the state's radiation
protection rule for Wednesday, October 8, 2008 from 10:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. in
Room 11 of the State House, 115
State Street, Montpelier, VT.
The committee is exercising its authority under 3 V.S.A. § 817 to hold a
public hearing on an existing rule, the Vermont Department of Health’s
radiological health rule, subchapter 1, on radiation protection, which may be
viewed online at http://healthvermont.gov/regs/radio_health.pdf. The committee is interested in determining
whether the Department of Health should have gone through, or should go through,
the formal rulemaking process regarding the possible revision of the
long-standing regulatory standard that establishes the number of millirems allowed per year at the site boundary of the
Yankee nuclear facility in Vernon.
Among issues of particular
interest to the committee are:
- Rule
5-303(K), the definition of "Rem" that defines a dose of one
Roentgen (R) due to gamma radiation as being the equivalent to a dose of
one rem.
- Rule
5-305(A), which specifies that the Department of Health "shall use
the recommendations contained in the reports of the National Council on
Radiation Protection and Measurements and the handbooks of the National
Bureau of Standards as standards and bases for calculations to obtain and
maintain safe conditions…”
- Rule
5-305(B)( 1)(E)( 1), which states: "The annual dose objective of the
total body of an individual in an unrestricted area due to plant
emanations of gamma radiation is 5
millirems.
For the purpose of this objective, 20 millirems
per year at any point on the site boundary bordered by land shall be
considered equivalent to a 5 millirem dose at
the nearest residences in Vermont."
It appears that pursuant to its
authority in 5-305(A), the Department may have revised its standards with
regard to the acceptable annual dose to humans located at the site boundary,
but has done so by means of an internal computation, without revising the
language that remains in rule 5-303 and
rule 5-305. Of additional concern
to the Committee is whether this possible revision may be in conflict with the
requirements for formal rulemaking set forth in 3 V.S.A. chapter 25 (Vermont
Administrative Procedure Act).